Assessing the Common Core Standards: Real Life Matematics

Based on a Blog by Andrew Miller

Originally Publication Date on June 28, 2011

Make mathematics relevant.  I think I have an easier time of this than most math teachers since I teach at a Career-Tech Center where real world application of math is seen in most programs.  The new Common Core State Standards require even a higher level of relevancy.  The new standards are intended to incorporate real life problem solving skills and states that “we can do better” than the text book word problems.  The major difference between Michigan’s old standards and the new more rigorous common core is that the real life problems solving should be project based learning.  The author, Andrew Miller, recommends that students be given some criteria but allowed to research and make decisions along the way to accomplish the task.  His examples include requiring students to design a pool, a pyramid, organic garden to demonstrate their ability to calculate area or volume.  He cautions that we as teachers must not provide too many details.  The teacher should relate the high expectations in a clear rubric.  By making the application more authentic we will replace the old contrived word problems with realistic usage of mathematics.

Miller, A. (2011, June 28). Assessing the common core standards: real life mathematics [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/assessing-common-core-standards-real-life-mathematics